<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: TrafficJunky Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://adnetsreview.com/trafficjunky-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://adnetsreview.com/trafficjunky-review/</link>
	<description>Ad Networks Reviews, Hosting Reviews, Payment Proofs, WordPress Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 18:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike R.		</title>
		<link>https://adnetsreview.com/trafficjunky-review/#comment-6789</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike R.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://adnetsreview.com/?p=4041#comment-6789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CPM is very low for 80% US traffic, I&#039;m hitting $0.019, lower than exoclick and juicy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPM is very low for 80% US traffic, I&#8217;m hitting $0.019, lower than exoclick and juicy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Database Caching 9/125 queries in 0.053 seconds using Disk (Request-wide modification query)

Served from: adnetsreview.com @ 2026-07-03 18:31:01 by W3 Total Cache
-->